General Objects
@ Heaven Gallery
1550 N Milwaukee Ave, 2nd floor, Chicago, IL 60622
Opening Friday, December 10th, from 7PM - 11PM
On view through Sunday, January 23rd
On view: December 10th – January 23rd
Opening Reception: 7â11 PM
Mask required. No reservation needed.
Curated by: Danny Floyd and Jeff Prokash
With artists: Conrad Cheung, Catherine Hu, stephanie mei huang, Gary LaPointe Jr, Hannah Lawson, Clayton Phillips, and Unyimeabasi Udoh
ââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
Certain objects are recognizable on the archetypal level. These objects slip easily between contexts and ontologies. In other words, a window is a window in many ways to many people. A window is a free agent, easily adapting conceptually depending on the vantage point. An archetypal object is not so basic that it has no meaning; rather, it is a lightning rod for meaning. Its simplicity leaves a void that is filled with signification very quickly because nature abhors a vacuum.
In 1965, Donald Judd wrote an essay called âSpecific Objectsâ which attempted to take stock of the rapidly changing world of postmodern sculpture. At the time, it was a radical idea that art no longer had to reference anything outside of itself. Interestingly, he draws a distinction between âsculptureâ and âthree-dimensional artâ saying that a bronze cast from a wax model, for instance, is a sculpture, but a fluorescent light presented as art material had more specificity to it. It was a particular and peculiar thing to do. This was âthree-dimensional art.â
We are working through different problems with our art now, but a similar analogy can be drawn between our experiences with objects in the world and objects in the gallery. Sometimes, when those objects appear the same (or even are the same), the lightning rod effect is accelerated.
The artists in the show present General Objects sometimes as a counter to, sometimes as an extension of, sometimes a perversion of, sometimes as a joke about Juddâs Specific Objects. The Minimalism of Juddâs era tried to simplify the object beyond signifying an image, so that it was specific unto itself. But these works simplify the object to its most potent image. They create signifiers that are just free-floating enough to elicit major emotional, political, contemplative, or relational connotations.
« previous event
next event »